Another Smoking Gun: The Pentagon Caught Again on MEDEVAC
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
12 June 2012
The Pentagon has repeatedly deceived Senators, Representatives and the Public on the MEDEVAC issue. This fact pattern has been systematically revealed and irrevocably proven. For instance, top Generals have said that if ground commanders requested changes to MEDEVAC procedures, they would get them. This smoking gun document proves otherwise:


Reader support is crucial to this mission. Weekly or monthly recurring ‘subscription’ based support is the best, though all are greatly appreciated. Recurring and one-time donations are available through PayPal or Authorize.net.
To send a check or money order:
Michael Yon
P O Box 5553
Winter Haven, FL 33880-5553
I will continue to do my part in telling the stories that are not being told. Readers must also do their part by keeping the cash flowing. Cash is essential .
Thank you!
Michael








Comments
He is stating that using a helicopter as an ambulance automatically makes it subject to the Geneva Convention. Nothing could be further from the truth. By not marking Air Ambulances with the Red Cross symbol you allow flexibility of use of that aircraft. The commander can choose to arm or not arm the ambulance as you would have no restrictions. This is entirely a turf war by the office of the Surgeon General. Note in the last paragraph where he states that he “retains visibility over these units”. He’s telling everyone that “HE” is in charge and that “HE” is making the call. Not the commander on the ground.
This is where the fight is and this needs to be pointed out and the Army needs to stop painting Red Crosses on any air ambulances and arm all of them. That way an air ambulance can land into a hot zone and extract the wounded Soldier without having to have additional supporting aircraft.
Anyway, I'd like to welcome the Surgeon General to 21st century military doctrine and hope you see the forest despite liking your vegetable garden and get with the program.
Did anyone see a reference to wounded soldiers in the letter or saving lives in general?
RSS